Pfizer was fined $2.3 billion in 2009 for “the intent to defraud or mislead” about their drug Bextra. So, it isn’t surprising to learn that researchers involved with their Covid vaccine clinical trial are reporting issues related to specimen labeling, adverse event follow-ups, data integrity issues, etc., as documented in the BMJ.
Pfizer has released a six month update of the trial data which makes it clear, that, even accepting their data at face value, the jab should never have been approved. Pfizer reported 15 deaths in the treated group, compared to 14 deaths in the control group.
It is increasingly common for trials to use the standard of “all cause morbidity,” in which all the negative outcomes of a treatment, rather than a select set chosen to make the outcome look positive, are recorded and used as the criteria for whether or not a treatment is better than a placebo. Pfizer’s data shows that the vaccine fails using the criteria of all cause morbidity. (See Table S3.) Furthermore, the treated group suffered 262 “severe events,” as compared to 150 in the control group!
In the treated group none died from Covid while two died from Covid in the control group. This seems to be the basis upon which approval was given, i.e. “it prevented Covid.” But we already know that this is a questionable interpretation since, according to the CDC Weekly Report, only 5% of Covid deaths are Covid-only deaths, the remainder being people with an average of four other diseases. So, it is unlikely that either of those two deaths are Covid-only deaths making this a questionable basis to approve the vaccine, even for this limited criteria.
The FDA seems to be participating in the fraud. FDA would like permission to hide the details about what they knew about the vaccine trials for a period of 55 years. One can only wonder what else they know besides the devastating enough admission that more people died in the treated group than in the control group?
A paper entitled Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? has damning conclusions:
- “A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.”
- “CDC showed that 94% of the reported deaths had multiple comorbidities, thereby reducing the CDC’s numbers attributed strictly to COVID-19 to about 35,000 for all age groups. Given the number of high false positives from the high amplification cycle PCR tests, and the willingness of healthcare professionals to attribute death to COVID-19 in the absence of tests or sometimes even with negative PCR tests, this 35,000 number is probably highly inflated as well.”
- “Given that the risk of contracting COVID-19 with serious outcomes is negligible in this population, proceeding with mass inoculation of children 12–15 years old based on the trials that were conducted cannot be justified on any cost-benefit ratio findings.”
How do we make sense of such a failure (a failure from the perspective of health, as opposed to profit) of a treatment and the continuing push from government, media and various health agencies to use the treatment, now even for children who need it least? Well, the Gates Foundation has give away hundreds of millions of dollars to such organizations to do their bidding.
Recipients of this cash include many of America’s most important news outlets, including CNN, NBC, NPR, PBS and The Atlantic. Gates also sponsors a myriad of influential foreign organizations, including the BBC, The Guardian, The Financial Times and The Daily Telegraph in the UK; prominent European newspapers such as Le Monde, Der Spiegel, etc.
That would explain why Bill Gates can admit in an interview about the Covid vaccines, “We didn’t have vaccines that block transmission.” (Watch at the 28:00 mark.) Yet, this admission has been buried by mainstream news outlets. It is a huge admission. It essentially says the vaccines can do nothing to stop the spread of the “virus” because it doesn’t block transmission. But far from stopping the spread, a look at any graph showing Covid cases and vaccine acceptance makes it clear (at least to this writer) that the vaccines are causing the rise in “Covid cases.”
Take a look at the graph of Gibraltar which has a nearly 100% vaccination rate.
The author of the graph (with data sourced from WHO) adds a snarky comment in his tweet, wondering if the one unvaccinated guy in the whole country is sitting there wondering “how can this possibly be a pandemic of just me?!”
The graph shows that the more vaccinated a country is, the more “cases” there are. The vaccine is causing illness! Some are still calling this illness “Covid” based upon the same faulty diagnostics that the whole crisis was built upon – the PCR test that was devised with no samples of the virus available to the developers.
There is good reason not to trust the vaccine trial data; even accepting the data at face value shows the vaccines cause more harm than good; there are now more Covid cases after vaccination than before; and, Gates, the largest supporter and funder of vaccines, admits they don’t block transmission! The vaccines are a huge failure and a swindle of monumental proportions. It’s time for the lawyers to step in.
Sources:
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial
How Many People in Key Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trial Died? More Than Pfizer Told You.
FDA Asks Court for 55 Years to Fully Release Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Data
Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?
Conflict of Interest? Bill Gates Gave $319 Million to Major Media Outlets, Documents Reveal
Gates: Covid vaccines don’t block transmission (28:00)
Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine