The pandemic lockdown in the US began in mid-March 2020 so we are approaching the three-year anniversary. It’s a good time to put it all in chronological order – the things that led to the lockdown, the lockdown itself, and the vaccine roll-out. Then, we’ll see what can be concluded from looking backward.
The Historical Context
This brief history provides a foundation for understanding the events of 2020 and beyond.
- The early 1900s
- The Spanish Flu
- World War II
- The Mid 1900s
- The Stanley Milgram experiment
- AIDS
- The 1986 Act
- Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
- Peter Daszak reveals the plan in 2016?
- Dr. Fauci predicts: “There will be a surprise outbreak.”
- The “global predators” position themselves for the coming pandemic
- Event 201
- Kary Mullis’s Death
The concept of a virus remained hazy and unproven. Diseases such as scurvy and pellagra were long thought to be contagious, but, actually, were caused by dietary deficiencies.
The so-called Spanish Flu killed millions and was considered to be the result of an infectious agent, though there is no evidence of that. The “flu” coincided with a time of war and all the associated challenges and deprivations associated with it. As Arthur Firstenberg points out in his book, The Invisible Rainbow, radio technology was being rolled out at the time and there is a relationship between the roll-out of electromagnetic-based technologies and pandemics.
A paper with Dr. Fauci’s name on it concludes the Spanish Flu “likely resulted directly from secondary bacterial pneumonia caused by common upper respiratory–tract bacteria.”
Firstenberg describes experiments performed in 1918 attempting to prove that the flu is transmitted from person to person by normal contact. But all such experiments failed. Today, such experiments are considered unethical, so, experiments confirming contagion are not done.
The Nazis used propaganda to scare and turn the German people against the Jews. Jews were said to be unclean and carriers of typhus. There is a parallel during the Covid era in which unvaccinated people are accused of being spreaders of a disease.
Polio is said to be caused by a virus, but, there is much reason to believe that it is actually a result of toxic chemical exposure, especially from the pesticide DDT, which was widely used at the time. Vaccines were given credit for eradicating diseases that were already disappearing before the associated vaccines were introduced. (Dr. Suzanne Humphries, author of Dissolving Illusions, has a website with a video showing that deaths from whooping cough, measles and scarlet fever were already mostly a thing of the past by the time the associated vaccines were introduced).
Experimental subjects administered (what they thought were) sucessivley higher electrical shocks to another test subject after each incorrect answer on a test. (The test-taker was an actor who was not really being shocked). A man in a white lab coat would coax the “teacher” to continue to administer the shocks saying, “The experiment requires that you continue.” Two-thirds of the subjects obeyed, despite their moral qualms, to administer what could have been fatal shocks. This experiment explained much of what we saw in Nazi Germany as well as explaining much of what we have seen during the Covid era.
AIDS is a big topic. However, a single book completely destroys the idea that a virus was the cause of AIDS. So, I refer you to Inventing the AIDS Virus, by Peter Duesberg. I’ll leave you with a few questions to pique your interest. If AIDS was contagious, why didn’t it spread outside of three major metropolitan areas? If AIDS was contagious, why did it not spread to the spouses of those “infected” or to those treating them? If HIV causes AIDS, why do many HIV-positive people not get AIDS and why do many AIDS patients not test HIV-positive?
In 1986 drug companies were indemnified from liability for any harm caused by vaccines. These companies no longer had a financial incentive to ensure that their products were safe.
In a 2010 document The Rockefeller Foundation discusses a “lock step” scenario described as “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.”
This document is so prescient that one could be forgiven for considering the possibility that it is actually a plan rather than a hypothetical scenario. One scenario imagines a pandemic that causes governments to implement a lock step strategy causing industries to be debilitated, office buildings to be empty for months, and shops closed. In the scenario, the US was considered too lenient in allowing air travel and China is lauded for enforcing quarantines and their “near-hermetic” sealing off of borders. Oddly enough that is what happened in 2020.
“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”
Peter Daszak’s quote above reads almost as an admission that if the media were on-board a vaccine could be sold to the public and profits would follow. And in 2020 that is exactly what happened.
In 2017, Dr. Fauci stated “There will be a surprise outbreak.” By itself it might not seem like much but when put in context with the Rockefeller lock step scenario and the Peter Daszak quote and the certainty with which Fauci states it, it starts to be suspicious.
Dr. Peter Breggin has written COVID-19 and the Global Predators, and based much of it on documents that can be construed as a pandemic business plan that was implemented throughout the 2010s.
Dr. David Martin’s document The Fauci COVID-19 Dossier includes a list of “5,100 patents and patent applications filed for the express purpose of controlling some aspect of the SARS coronavirus.”
Dr. Breggin points us to the business plan and Dr. Martin shows us the technology that implements it.
Shortly before the pandemic there was a simulation exercise called Event 201 attended by representatives from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, US intelligence agencies, banks, media companies and Pharma. They simulated the spread of a hypothetical coronavirus and war-gamed strategies that included censoring dissident voices.
Kary Mullis won the Nobel prize for the invention of PCR technology used in the Covid test. PCR is at the heart of biotechnology, molecular biology and virology. Mullis, nonetheless, insisted that people were using PCR to make unfounded claims about viruses because PCR could find traces of just about any nucleotide sequence in just about any sample. Yet these sequences were claimed to be proof of certain viruses.
“Years from now, people will find our acceptance of the HIV theory of AIDS as silly as we find those who excommunicated Galileo,” Mullis said in his autobiography.
Mullis died in the fall of 2019. If he had been around in 2020 he probably would have criticized the way in which PCR was used to “prove” the existence of a novel coronavirus, just as he criticized the idea that HIV was the cause of AIDS.
Read Anatomy of the “Covid Pandemic” – Part II, The Lockdown
Read Anatomy of the “Covid Pandemic” – Part III, The Vaccines