The verdicts are coming in and the Covid PCR test is already losing in court. The Covid PCR test paved the way for world-wide lockdowns and other tyrannical measures, which, according to Reiner Fuellmich, constitute “the worst crimes against humanity ever committed.”
Four German vacationers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one tested positive for Covid-19 have won their case in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.
In a case in Weimar, Germany, Prof. Dr. Kämmerer testified that a PCR test can not provide any information on whether a person is infected with an active pathogen or not. This is because the test does not make a distinction between dead matter or live matter. The detected matter, even if it actually were a virus, could have been dead for months.
Dr. Stefan Lanka made waves several years ago when he offered 100,000 euros to anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus. He was sued for the money but never had to pay, as the court ruled that no evidence proving the existence of measles virus was presented. Dr. Lanka is now suing the scientist behind the scientific paper that paved the way for using the PCR test for Covid.
Dr. Lanka writes that Prof. Christian Drosten “has not only violated the most fundamental rules of scientific work with his actions in the Corona crisis. His action to construct an alleged virus detection test and to offer it to the world public via the World Health Organization (WHO) – before the Chinese scientists in charge of it had published indications of a possible presence of a harmless or dangerous virus – had the intention to globalize the wave of panic in Wuhan, China which started on December 30, 2019.
“Prof. Drosten knows that with his test, even under the assumption that a SARS-CoV-2 virus would actually exist and that it has been proven to have pathogenic properties, and to this day the virologists involved point out that this evidence has not yet been provided, he cannot detect an intact, infectious virus, but at best fragments attributed to the virus that cannot distinguish between endogenous and exogenous substances.”
In other words, no one has proven that the supposed new virus is pathogenic. Furthermore, no one has detected a complete, intact virus, only fragments (molecules of RNA) that are supposedly pieces of a virus. And, no one has demonstrated that what is detected has its origins from outside the body rather than from inside the body, such as from normal cell breakdown or cell detoxification.
The Corman-Drosten paper was submitted to Eurosurveillance on January 21, 2020 and accepted for publication on January 22, 2020 and was on-line by January 23, 2020. On January 13, 2020, before the paper was published, the protocol was published at the official WHO website.
That’s odd. In the course of one day the paper was submitted and accepted. That makes one wonder … did anyone at Eurosurveillance even read it? Clearly, the typical peer review process was skipped. A possible explanation for this is that Mr. Drosten is also on the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. Given this, and a plethora of scientific deficiencies/errors, a group of scientists have submitted a letter to request a retraction of the Corman-Drosten paper.
Furthermore, this group has submitted their own paper rebutting the Corman-Drosten paper, External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results
Here are a few of the 10 flaws discussed:
– The primers used are “non-specific”
Think of the primers as a search string. The more specific the search string, the more targeted the results. If you go to Spotify and search for “rock music” you will find a lot more results than if you search for “Swedish pop rock and roll band.” In the case of the Drosten PCR test the primers are the equivalent of searching for “rock music” … a lot of matches are possible.
– The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments.
The test merely looks for small strands of DNA – far less than the whole genome of the supposed virus. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool.
– There is no standard specified for the cycle threshold
Think of the cycle threshold as amplification of the biological specimens. If the tests are not run at a standard cycle threshold the tests are meaningless.
– The test was never verified in any way
All individuals testing positive are assumed to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 infections. There are severe flaws in this assumption. First, a positive test for the RNA molecules described in the Corman-Drosten paper cannot be equated to “infection with a virus”. A positive RT-PCR test merely indicates the presence of certain RNA molecules. Even more egregious, the functionality of the published RT-PCR Test was not demonstrated with the use of a positive control. Simply put: no one ever found isolated SARS-CoV-2 virus in anyone who tested positive.
Dr. Stefan Lanka is not the only one preparing to sue Mr. Drosten. According to Reiner Fuellmich, “We Have the Evidence” that “these are the worst crimes against humanity ever committed.” He says, “This has never been about the virus. This has never been about health. This has been about taking everything away from us so that we would be dependent on them.” He goes on to say that this crime is also about population reduction and controlling those who are left through government decrees and vaccine passports. This crime is so big, he says that we will have to have a Nuremberg-like trial.
The good news, according to Fuellmich, is that once this crime is fully exposed the current trend towards centralization and globalization will reverse towards sovereignty and localization and we’ll experience a better world.
Given the large number of deaths from the vaccinations – 5,993 Covid vaccine related deaths recorded in the VAERS database as of late June 2021, more than the previous 20 years of deaths recorded in VAERS for other vaccines – it should not be too surprising that there are lawsuits about the vaccines, too. The American Frontline Doctors Founder, Dr. Simone Gold, spoke about the reasons for filing a motion to halt the use of vaccines in children: “This is an experimental biological agent whose harms are well-documented (although suppressed and censored) and growing rapidly, and we will not support using America’s children as guinea pigs.”
“We insist that the EUA not be relinquished prematurely; certainly not before trials are complete — Oct. 31, 2022 for Moderna and April 27, 2023 for Pfizer. We are shocked at the mere discussion of this, and will not be silent while Americans are used as guinea pigs for a virus with survivability of 99.8% globally and 99.97% under age 70.”
Sources:
Virologist Dr. Lanka press charges against Christian Drosten
Retraction request letter to Eurosurveillance editorial board
According to Reiner Fuellmich: ‘We Have the Evidence’
Physicians Group Files Motion to Halt Use of COVID Vaccines in Children